пʼятниця, 28 жовтня 2016 р.

Online Libraries

Odd Facts About Lewis Carroll

Alice fell down the famous rabbit hole 150 years ago, after family friend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (better known by his pen name, Lewis Carroll) told the story to the Liddell sisters on a boat trip down the Thames on July 4, 1862.
Ten-year-old Alice Liddell, delighted by the tale, asked him for a written copy of the story. The rest is history. Carroll published the adventures in 1865, and the book hasn't gone out of print since.
Here are five odd facts about Lewis Carroll (1832-1898), including his enthusiasm for word games, microscopes and photography.
1. Animal inspiration
"Alice in Wonderland" is chock-full of animals, including the Cheshire cat, flamingos that serve as croquet mallets and a baby that turns into a pig. Many of the animals were anthropomorphized versions of people that Alice and her sisters knew, said Carolyn Vega, assistant curator of literary and historical manuscripts at the Morgan Library & Museum in New York City.
In one Wonderland scene, Alice runs a race in circles with a dodo and a flock of other birds and animals. The dodo is supposed to be Carroll, whom everyone knew as Mr. Dodgson. He had a stammer, and sometimes haltingly introduced himself as "Dodo-Dodgson," said Vega, who researched the book for the Morgan Library & Museum's exhibit, "Alice: 150 Years of Wonderland," which runs until Oct. 11.
Carroll frequently visited the Oxford Museum of Natural History, and likely noticed a dodo skeleton and painting on display at the museum, Vega said. Scholars speculate that this dodo inspired him when he was writing and illustrating the book.  
Alice's sisters, Lorina and Edith, are also in the race scene as a lorry and an eaglet. Robinson Duckworth, who accompanied Carroll and the girls on the boat trip, is included in the story as his namesake — a duck.

2. Microscope maven
Lewis Carroll's Microscope.
Lewis Carroll's Microscope.
Credit: Copyright The Morgan Library & Museum Photography by Graham S. Haber, 2015
Just like modern early technology adopters, Carroll bought the latest microscope of his day. The microscope, manufactured in 1859 by Smith & Beck of London, was "something that he had for his whole life and took incredible care of," Vega told Live Science.
Carroll used the microscope to look at amoebas, other protozoa and insect larvae, according to the Morgan's exhibit. In a letter to his sister Elizabeth, he wrote, "This is a most interesting sight, as the creatures are most conveniently transparent, and you see all kinds of organs jumping about like a complicated piece of machinery … Everything goes on at railway speed, so I suppose they must be some of those insects that only live a day or two, and try to make the most of it."
Making a connection to the railway wasn't surprising for a Victorian.
"This is during the exact boon of the railway expansion across Britain," Vega said. Just as people compare concepts today to computers, people in the mid-1800s compared ideas to railroads, which was cutting-edge technology at the time, she said.
3. Word and logic games
Wonderland may be an absurd place, but it's surprisingly logical at times. Perhaps that's because Carroll, who taught mathematics for 26 years at Christ Church at the University of Oxford, infused logic into his writing and games.
In "Syzygies," a game Carroll created, players change letters in one word to make another. For example, walrus; peruse; harper; carpenter. 

Alice's in Wonderland Hidden Messages


To fully experience what it means to vanish down a rabbit hole, just ask the internet about hidden messages in the book that coined the term, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Lewis Carroll’s fantastical tale of magic cakes and secret doors, grinning cats and warbling turtles, has never been out of print since it was first published. Over the course of a century and a half, it’s inspired films, paintings, a ballet and computer games. There’s even a neurological syndrome named after it. Yet its most voluminous by-product by far is alternate readings. Delve into the writings of generations of critics, scholars and bloggers, and this beloved bedtime classic becomes variously an allegory on drug culture, a parable of British colonisation, and the story of a heroine with a bad case of penis envy.
With the waning of Victorian prudery and the birth of psychoanalytical theory, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderlandseemed a good deal less innocent
The book began life humbly, as entertainment for 10-year-old Alice Liddell and her sisters as they boated on the Thames with one Charles Dodgson. It proved such a hit that Alice persuaded Dodgson to transcribe it, which he duly did – using the nom de plume Lewis Carroll. Alice was the daughter of the dean of Christ Church, the Oxford college where Dodgson taught mathematics, and she wasn’t the only young girl he befriended. To the 21st Century mind, there is something that makes one deeply uneasy about this scenario. Though there is no evidence of anything untoward in Dodgson’s relationships, it’s hard not to view as suspect a grown man who enjoyed having his young playmates sit on his lap and pose for photographs, often under-dressed.
Famed literary scholar William Empson got especially carried away, declaring that Alice is "a father in getting down the hole, a foetus at the bottom, and can only be born by becoming a mother and producing her own amniotic fluid".
There is no concrete evidence that Carroll ever experimented with mind-altering drugs
Of course, sometimes a caterpillar smoking a hookah is just that – especially when he’s flanked by a magical mushroom. Since the 1960s, drug-lovers have read Alice’s antics as one big trip. The lyrics to Jefferson Airplane’s White Rabbit did a fair bit to cement the association: “Remember what the Dormouse said / Feed your head, feed your head”. From its heat-addled opening scene, there is a psychedelic vibe – besides all those pills, time moves erratically, and the grinning Cheshire Cat is here one minute, gone the next.


Of cabbages and kings
Another strand of criticism views Alice as a political allegory. When our heroine leaps after the White Rabbit, she ends up in a place that, for all its zany, disconcerting strangeness, is ruled over by a quick-tempered queen – Dodgson reputedly had mixed feelings about Queen Victoria even though she loved his book – and has a shambolic legal system, much like Victorian Britain.
Perhaps Alice is a parable of eating disorders or a satire of the Wars of the Roses
And how does Alice act in this strange land? Befuddled by the natives’ way of doing things, she tries to impose her own values with very nearly calamitous results. Couldn’t the novel therefore be an allegory for colonisation?

Some critics have thought the caterpillar is a symbol – no matter what, his drug-culture proclivities are undeniable

There’s also the question of The Walrus and the Carpenter, the poem that Tweedledum and Tweedledee recite to Alice. According to some interpretations, the carpenter is Jesus and the walrus Peter, with the oysters as disciples. Others insist that it’s about Empire, with the walrus and the carpenter representing England, and the oysters its colonies. Even J.B. Priestley weighed into the debate, suggesting that the walrus and the carpenter are instead archetypes of two different types of politician.
To peruse the wild and wacky theories that successive generations have dreamt up concerning the ‘true’ meaning of Alice’s adventures is to understand how changing social mores can radically alter a text. Of course, it’s a testament to the work’s essential timelessness that each era has been able to read its own fads and preoccupations into the story.

Carroll's Most Underrated Works You Need To Check Out

The Hunting of the Snark

The Hunting of the Snark – also up there with Carroll’s better-known publications – is another work often overshadowed by his magnum opus – at least by the casual Carroll fan. Published in 1876, this epic nonsense poem is Carroll’s longest poetic piece, a phantasmagorical tale of a ship full of misfits on a voyage to catch a mysterious creature – the Snark of the title.
While many analyses have attempted to make sense of The Hunting of the Snark‘s enigmatic prose –American author and scholar Morton N. Cohen notes, in his 1995 biography of Carroll, various interpretations, including the poem as existential drama or a parody of the Victorian cause célèbre, the curious Tichborne case – perhaps the poem’s true joy lies in it linking with Carroll’s other works. Those who have read Through the Looking-Glass may notice a few of his creatures and invented words – the ‘frumious Bandersnatch’ included – amidst the pages of The Hunting of the Snark.

A Tangled Tale

Carroll’s skills as a mathematician – he spent several years studying and teaching the subject at the University of Oxford’s Christ Church college – is often overlooked; A Tangled Tale is testament to both his talent for storytelling and Mathematics. First published as a series in the Monthly Packet (a magazine aimed at girls) between 1880 and 1885, A Tangled Tale takes the form of ten short, amusing stories – or ‘knots,’ as Carroll referred to them – within which mathematical problems are presented.
Described by Carroll as ‘for the amusement, and possible edification, of the readers of that fair magazine,’ it would seem the writer was later dissatisfied with his efforts, stating at the end of the series that A Tangled Tale was ‘but a lame attempt.’ His nephew, Stuart Dodgson Collingwood, however, thought differently, stating in his biography The Life and Letters of Lewis Carroll (published just a few months after the writer’s death in 1898) that ‘it is certainly the most successful attempt he ever made to combine mathematics and humour.’

Sylvie and Bruno

With Sylvie and Bruno (1889) – followed-up four years later with Sylvie and Bruno Concluded – Carroll sought to write a novel completely different from the Alice series, stating in the book’s preface that he sought to ‘strike out yet another new path: be it good or bad.’ Sadly, Carroll’s efforts to break out from his best known work went under-appreciated, and the book received negative reviews and sold just 13,000 copies; thankfully, more contemporary critiques of Sylvie and Bruno call for a re-evaluation of the novel.
Following its eponymous characters, siblings Sylvie and Bruno, the novel combines two plots – one set in ‘Fairyland,’ a familiar, Carroll-esque world full of his trademark nonsensical elements, and one set in Victorian Britain that takes the form of a social novel in which the characters explore themes of society, morality and religion. Unfamiliar territory, perhaps, but as Sylvie and Bruno and its conclusion are the last novels published within Carroll’s lifetime, the novel makes for an interesting read.

Some Popular Fallacies about Vivisection

So far, we have covered Carroll’s talents as both writer and mathematician, but not many know that the man behind Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland was also a voice in Victorian Britain’s anti-vivisection movement.
Published in the Fortnightly Review in 1875, Carroll’s ‘Some Popular Fallacies about Vivisection‘ draws comparisons between animal testing and field sports, argues against the misconception that mankind’s dominion over animals justifies the infliction of suffering and argues that such attitudes could easily see the practice of vivisection extended to human subjects.
An illuminating insight into Victorian practices of animal testing and attitudes towards it – the writer’s own disapproving reaction included –, ‘Some Popular Fallacies about Vivisection’ concludes that ‘the principle of selfishness lies at the root of this accursed practice.’

Euclid and his Modern Rivals

Published in 1879 under his birth name, Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, Euclid and his Modern Rivals is a part-academic, part-literary work arguing for the importance of the seminal Greek mathematician’s teachings of geometry.
While its subject matter may be daunting, its form and tone – set out like a dramatic play and purposefully imbued with humour and light-heartedness – makes Euclid and his Modern Rivals an approachable book for the less mathematically minded. Indeed, as Carroll stated in the book’s preface, he did this precisely ‘to make it a little less tedious and a little more acceptable to unscientific readers.’

A List of Most Remarkable Works

Many of Carroll’s philosophies were based on games. His interest in logic came purely from the playful nature of its principle rather than its uses as a tool. He primarily wrote comic fantasies and humorous verse that was often very childlike. Carroll published his novel Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland in 1865, followed by Through the Looking Glassin 1872. Alice’s story began as a piece of extemporaneous whimsy meant to entertain three little girls on a boating trip in 1862. Both of these works were considered children’s novels that were satirical in nature and in exemplification of Carroll’s wit. Also famous is Carroll’s poem “Jabberwocky," in which he created nonsensical words from word combinations.


Selected Bibliography

Poetry

Further Nonsense Verse and Prose (1926)
Phantasmagoria and Other Poems (1869)
The Collected Verse of Lewis Carroll (1932)
The Complete Illustrated Works of Lewis Carroll (1982)
The Complete Works of Lewis Carroll (1939)
The Humorous Verse of Lewis Carroll (1960)
The Hunting of the Snark: An Agony in Eight Fits (1876)
Useful and Instructive Poetry (1954)


Prose

A Guide to the Mathematical Student (1864)
A Method of Taking Votes on More than Two Issues (1876)
A Selection from the Letters of Lewis Carroll to His Child-friends (1933)
A Syllabus of Plane Algebraical Geometry (1860)
A Tangled Tale (1885)
Alice’s Adventures Under Ground (1886)
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865)
An Elementary Treatise on Determinants (1867)
Curiosa Mathematica, Part I: A New Theory of Parallels (1888)
Curiosa Mathematica, Part II: Pillow-Problems (1893)
Diaries of Lewis Carroll (1953)
Diversions and Digressions (1961)
Doublets: A Word-Puzzle (1879)
Eight or Nine Wise Words about Letter-Writing (1890)
Euclid and His Modern Rivals (1879)
Feeding the Mind (1907)
For the Train (1932)
Lewis Carroll, Photographer (1949)
Mathematical Recreations of Carroll (1958)
Rhyme? And Reason? (1883)
Suggestions as to the Best Method of Taking Votes (1874)
Supplement to “Euclid and His Modern Rivals” (1885)
Sylvie and Bruno (1889)
Sylvie and Bruno Concluded (1893)
Symbolic Logic, Part I: Elementary (1896)
Symbolic Logic, Parts I and II (1977)
Syzygies and Lanrick: A Word-Puzzle and a Game (1893)
The Annotated Alice: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass (1960)
The Blank Cheque: A Fable (1874)
The Dynamics of a Particle (1865)
The Fifth Book of Euclid Treated Algebraically (1868)
The Formulae of Plane Trigonometry (1861)
The Game of Logic (1886)
The Letters of Lewis Carroll, ed. Morton Cohen with the assistance of Roger Lancelyn Green (1979)
The Lewis Carroll Picture-Book (1899)
The New Belfry of Christ Church, Oxford (1872)
The New Method of Evaluation (1865)
The Nursery Alice (1889)
The Rectory Umbrella and Mischmasch (1932)
The Vision of the Three T’s (1873)
Three Years in a Curatorship, by One Who Has Tried (1886)

Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There (1872)


неділя, 16 жовтня 2016 р.

The most Famous Film Version

In Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, the heroine notices that there are only three guests at the Mad Hatter's famous tea party (with herself the fourth) but the table has many more pristine, unnecessary place-settings. The Hatter explains, "It's always tea-time, and we've no time to wash the things between whiles.' 'Then you keep moving round, I suppose?' said Alice. 'Exactly so,' said the Hatter, 'as the things get used up.' 'But what happens when you come to the beginning again?' Alice ventured to ask. 'Suppose we change the subject,' the March Hare interrupted." Mischievously, maddeningly, Lewis Carrollwithholds for ever the secret of what happens when the tea-party guests use up the dishes – the story's action exists in the eternal present of a riddle.

Tim Burton has revealed 145 years later what happens when all the tea-things are soiled. His new movie imagines Alice returning as a 19-year-old to this strange land, to find that it is plunged in gloom. The tea party is still going, but all the dishes are wrecked, the cups have sprung leaks and the event itself is sited in some wasteland, like a depiction of the Somme. It is difficult to tell if this is an intentional answer to Carroll's original joke or just part of the inevitable goth darkness that Burton conjures up. Even Alice, played by Australian newcomer Mia Wasikowska, has dark shadows around her eyes.

Johnny Depp is the Mad Hatter, with weird gingery hair, enlarged, psychedelically coloured pupils, and an accent which lurches wildly from lispy BBC English to broad Shrek Scots. Wonderland, or rather, as it is known, "underland", is held under the awful tyranny of the Red Queen, well played by Helena Bonham Carter, as a hydrocephalic nightmare by Charles M Schulz. She has a tiny body and gigantic head, with a lollipop-heart shaped hairdo, a motif reproduced in a horrid little lipstick pout. Her wretched subjects need a champion to rescue them – Alice.
There are some funny exchanges, particularly between the Red Queen and the Mad Hatter, but for me the weightless, frictionless, whimsical world of fantasy is often, frankly, dull. Burton's visual design is of course highly distinctive, though even here I have to raise a complaint against the subliminal corporate-branding which makes the White Queen's palace look like the Disney castle logo.

As ever, I can't rid myself of the feeling that for all the funkily crepuscular mood that Burton creates, this is a pretty conventional work, and I feel that in my lifetime I have now seen enough quality adaptations of Alice featuring a cameo-rich gallery of big-time comics and thesps. This one features the talents of Matt Lucas, Michael Sheen, Stephen Fry and Alan Rickman. Why not do the next Alice movie on digital video with no big stars and no effects? Or is that one of the six impossible things that the White Queen said she could imagine before breakfast?